Powered By Blogger

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Veranda Solar

Can Oakland Startup Veranda Become the Apple of Solar?

Written by Jennifer Kho

Updated: Apple has developed a reputation for sleek, hip and user-friendly computers and electronics. Now, Veranda Solar, a startup based in Portland, Ore. and Oakland, Calif., developing small, easy-to-install solar-power systems, says it wants to become the Apple of consumer solar products. (Updated to reflect that the company works out of both cities.)

verandasolar_proto_pic1

How so? Instead of focusing on a new solar chemistry or production technology, the company hopes to differentiate itself with its aesthetics, appeal and ease of use, CEO Capra J’neva says. “We interact with real people to create our products, so we are reducing market risk by understanding the real needs of people who will buy [them],” she told us last week.

The Veranda Solar system “will appeal to the type of people who like Apple products,” J’neva said, though the company is also focused on the subset of those Apple aficionados who want to live a more sustainable lifestyle and do something positive for the environment. But unlike Apple, Veranda plans to offer affordable prices.

Founded in December, the startup is designing solar-power systems, made up of small (about 24-inch and 60- to 70-watt) panels with rounded corners, that consumers can install themselves. Veranda’s systems, based on prototypes that were developed at Stanford University with SunPower Corp., will fold flat — making them easy to ship — and snap together. The systems will include the panels, inverter and everything else needed to deliver power into a home, and will be certified to plug right into a standard wall outlet, J’neva said. The idea is that customers will be able to install them with only a screwdriver, mounting them on roofs, windowsills, balconies or walls.

From the photos, the prototype panel designs look a bit like a four-leaf clover and a lily pad. “We were wanting to create a solar panel that was not intimidating to people, and our target market likes the rounded corners,” J’neva said. “It’s huggable.” But don’t expect the final design to look just like the prototypes. The company is now optimizing the panels for manufacturing, and that’s likely to encourage less roundness, meaning they’ll probably more closely resemble the smaller of the two prototypes, she said. “Obviously, we don’t want to waste that much glass, either,” she added.

The company, which presented at the Cleantech Forum in San Francisco last week, is seeking $1.5 million to bring its systems to the market, starting with the West Coast. Veranda already raised seed funding in the Dutch Postcode Lottery’s Picnic Green Challengebusiness-plan competition, when it won a second prize of €100,000 (about $123,000) last year.

The company plans to use its current round of funding to finish its third prototype, get Underwriters Laboratories certification and begin production. In spite of its panels’ different shape, Veranda says they can be made using existing equipment and processes. “We are not taking a 2-inch sample of solar-cell material and trying to scale it to production, requiring huge investments in capital equipment and research,” J’neva said. “Because we’re not a risky lab project, we expect we can bring [our product] to market later this year and make a profit within three years.”

Still, a new shape does bring a certain element of risk, said Travis Bradford, president of solar-research firm Prometheus Institute. “Any time you change your form factor, you have to change your approach to distribution and integration and maintenance,” he said. “That is a seriously nontrivial set of activities.” But the idea of making solar more attractive is an important one, he added. “A lot of people share an intuition that that is necessary and will occur, and nothing jumps to mind as a shining example of success yet.” he said. “Somebody’s going to sell sexy solar. The current crop isn’t that pretty.”

Veranda expects its systems, which include a panel, an inverter and cables, will start at $600 — or about $400 for just the panels, J’neva said. Veranda expects to sell systems at home-decor and home-improvement stores such as Pottery Barn, Restoration Hardware and Home Depot, as well as through utilities, direct sales and solar-specialty businesses. The company forecasts it will net $140,355 in sales from 300 customers this year and turn a profit in 2011.

www.verandasolar.com

www.earth2tech.com






Si se puede

Obama’s chance to lead the green recovery

By Joseph Stiglitz and Nicholas Stern

Published: March 2 2009 19:16 | Last updated: March 2 2009 19:16

We face two crises: a deep global financial crisis, caused by inadequate management of risk in the financial sector; and an even deeper climate crisis, the effects of which may seem more distant but will be determined by the actions we take now.

The scale of risk from climate change is altogether of a different and greater magnitude, as are the consequences of mismanaging or ignoring it. The US, in particular, has a window of opportunity to act on the financial crisis and, at the same time, lay the foundations for a new wave of growth based on the technologies for a low-carbon economy.

President Barack Obama, in his speech to Congress and budget last week, explained that we need to address both of these challenges, and outlined a broad approach. US leadership could generate a powerful response from across the world, making possible an agreement at the United Nations climate change conference in Copenhagen in December on a scale necessary to manage the risks involved.

We will eventually emerge from the financial crisis, although mistakes in management can affect its depth and duration. However, mistakes in managing the risks of the climate crisis may be irreversible. As noted in Making Globalization Work*, if we had a thousand planets we might continue with the reckless experiment on which we are embarked, and if the likely disaster occurred we could move on to another. Unfortunately we do not have that luxury: we have only one planet.

The financial crisis originated from the housing market bubble and was preceded by the dotcom boom. We cannot replace these with yet another bubble. The investments necessary to convert our society to a low-carbon economy – investments that can change the way we live and work – would drive growth over the next two or three decades. They would ensure that growth, with accompanying improvements in standards of living, was sustainable. The path that we have been on is not.

The economic crisis will leave the US and other economies greatly weakened and it will be imperative to increase efficiency. One area in which there is ample room for improvement is in the energy efficiency of businesses, consumers and the government.

According to a recent paper by the Peterson Institute, spending $10bn (€7.9bn, £7.1bn) to insulate US homes and federal buildings could create and sustain up to 100,000 jobs between 2009 and 2011, while saving the economy from $1.4bn to $3.1bn a year between 2012 and 2020.

This type of investment and those in green technology and infrastructure would not only provide a short-term stimulus but also improve the US competitive position. As the world moves to a low-carbon economy, there will be a competitive advantage for those who embrace these technologies.

Private investments are driven by market signals. These signals are distorted because we have been pricing one of the world’s scarcest resources – a “good” atmosphere; or the societal costs of emissions, which lead to a “bad” atmosphere – at zero. Not surprisingly, this has led to inefficient outcomes, with emissions levels too high and too little effort devoted to energy conservation and research.

Providing a strong, stable carbon price is the single policy action that is likely to have the biggest effect in improving economic efficiency and tackling the climate crisis. Clarity on policy and prices is all the more important now, with companies facing such uncertainty because of the financial crisis: the two risks compound each other, damping investment. We may not be able fully to resolve the risks of the financial crisis quickly; but we can take actions now that will markedly reduce uncertainties about future carbon policies and prices.

As creative entrepreneurs turn their minds to the challenges posed by a low-carbon economy, the excitement and drive of innovation is evident. This can be the spur to real growth that has so long been missing. The problems of global warming cannot be attacked without the participation of all countries. The world has been waiting for the US: there is now reason to believe that it is ready to lead.

Joseph Stiglitz, awarded the Nobel Prize in economics in 2001, is the author of Making Globalization Work*. Lord Stern is the IG Patel professor and chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics. They are attending the US Climate Action: a Global Economic Perspective symposium in Washington this Tuesday

Followers

About Me

My photo
I am pursuing a master's degree in energy resources policy and analysis at the University of Oklahoma. This blog chronicled my Sustainable Business and the Environment class.